Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792087›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2024

Angiographic challenges of spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistulas: report on 45 cases.

Keisuke Takai, Takeaki Endo, So Fujimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodal MRI features of spinal perimedullary versus dural arteriovenous fistulas: an exploratory analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Utility of T2-weighted MRI and contrast-enhanced MRA in locating the fistula level of spinal arteriovenous fistula.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keisuke TakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, 2-6-1, Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0042, Japan. takai-nsu@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-9849
Takeaki EndoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, 2-6-1, Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0042, Japan.
So FujimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, 2-6-1, Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0042, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe localization of the fistula level in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and epidural arteriovenous fistulas (edAVFs) remains a diagnostic challenge.

methodsConsecutive patients with spinal dAVFs and edAVFs in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions were included. The primary endpoint was to describe the characteristics of patients who required angiography with multiple catheterizations of segmental arteries (10 or more).

resultsForty-five patients (median age 69 years; male 89%; dAVFs, n = 31; edAVFs, n = 14) were included. Spinal dAVFs commonly developed in the thoracic region and edAVFs in the lumbosacral region. Fistulas were predicted at the correct level or plus/minus 2 level in less invasive examinations using multi-detector CT angiography (n = 28/36, 78%) and/or contrast-enhanced MR angiography (n = 9/14, 64%). We encountered diagnostic challenges in the localization of fistulas in 6 patients. They underwent angiography a median of 2 times. In each patient, spinal levels were examined at a median of 25 levels with a median radiation exposure of 3971 mGy and 257 ml of contrast. Fistulas were finally localized at the high thoracic region (T4-6) in 3 patients, the sacral region (S1-2) in 2, and the lumbar region (L3) in 1. Four patients were diagnosed with edAVFs and 2 with dAVFs. The correlation coefficient between the fistula level and the rostral end of the intramedullary T2 high-signal intensity on MRI was interpreted as none.

conclusionIn patients in whom less invasive examinations failed for fistula localization, high thoracic or sacral AVFs need to be considered.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous FistulaCentral Nervous System Vascular MalformationsAgedArteriesHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSacrumFistula localizationSpinal angiographySpinal dural arteriovenous fistulasSpinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.