Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792052›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2023

Age and associated outcomes among patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.

Shannon M Fernando, Graeme MacLaren, Ryan P Barbaro, Rebecca Mathew, Laveena Munshi, Purnema Madahar, Justin A Fried, Kollengode Ramanathan, Roberto Lorusso, Daniel Brodie and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Open questions with respect to extracorporeal circulatory support 2024].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shannon M Fernando *Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. sfernando@qmed.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-4289
Graeme MacLaren *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ryan P BarbaroDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rebecca MathewDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Laveena MunshiInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Purnema MadaharDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Justin A FriedDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Kollengode RamanathanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Roberto LorussoDepartment of Cardio Thoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daniel Brodie *Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel I McIsaac *Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) can be used to support severely ill patients with cardiogenic shock. While age is commonly used in patient selection, little is known regarding its association with outcomes in this population. We sought to evaluate the association between increasing age and outcomes following V-A ECMO.

methodsWe used individual-level patient data from 440 centers in the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. We included all adult patients receiving V-A ECMO from 2017 to 2019. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of complications following initiation of V-A ECMO. We conducted Bayesian analyses of the relationship between increasing age and outcomes of interest.

resultsWe included 15,172 patients receiving V-A ECMO. Of these, 8172 (53.9%) died in hospital. For the analysis conducted using weakly informed priors, and as compared to the reference category of age 18-29, the age bracket of 30-39 (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.79-1.10) was not associated with hospital mortality, but age brackets 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CrI: 1.08-1.47), 50-59 (OR 1.78, 95% CrI: 1.55-2.06), 60-69 (OR 2.24, 95% CrI: 1.94-2.59), 70-79 (OR 2.90, 95% CrI: 2.49-3.39) and ≥ 80 (OR 4.02, 95% CrI: 3.13-5.20) were independently associated with increasing hospital mortality. Similar results were found in the analysis conducted with an informative prior, as well as between increasing age and post-ECMO complications.

conclusionsAmong patients receiving V-A ECMO for cardiogenic shock, increasing age is strongly associated with increasing odds of death and complications, and this association emerges as early as 40 years of age.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremHospital MortalityHumansOdds RatioRegistriesRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicYoung AdultCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal life supportExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.