ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Comparison of parametric imaging and SUV imaging with [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetic modeling with total body PET-current status and future applications.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Parametric imaging of dynamic long-axial-field-of-view PET scans: Technical challenges, statistical insights and clinical applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Mitigating bladder signal inEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Enhanced data usability in dynamicEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Patlak-PBNT: a simple population-based Patlak model to generate [EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- The prognostic role of staging [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT volumetric and dissemination features in prostate cancer.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of early and standardAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Self-supervised neural network for Patlak-based parametric imaging in dynamic [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Dynamic FDG PET/CT imaging: quantitative assessment, advantages and application in the diagnosis of malignant solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Assessment of image-derived input functions from small vessels for patlak parametric imaging using total-body PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Current Clinical Applications of PSMA-PET for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment.Cancers · 2024Review
- Total-body dynamic PET/CT imaging reveals kinetic distribution of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- An update on the use of image-derived input functions for human PET studies: new hopes or old illusions?EJNMMI research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStandardized uptake value (SUV) has been prevalently used to measure [
methodsTwenty prostate cancer patients were included and underwent a dynamic total-body [
resultsKinetic modeling using 2T3k demonstrated favorable model fitting in both normal organs and lesions. All of the lesions detected on SUV images (55-60 min) could be detected on K
conclusionsTotal-body parametric imaging of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.