Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791593›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

The family meal, a ritual frozen in time; an Australian grounded theory study.

Georgia Middleton, Rebecca K Golley, Karen A Patterson, John Coveney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgia MiddletonCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Tarntanya, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-9122
Rebecca K GolleyCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Tarntanya, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Karen A PattersonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Tarntanya, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
John CoveneyCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Tarntanya, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Australian Commonwealth Research Training ProgramScholarship and King and Amy O'Malley Trust Postgraduate Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family meals are recognized as an opportunity to promote the health of families. Popular discourse posits that changes to contemporary family life have made family meals harder to achieve and promotion of the 'traditional' family meal may be adding pressures to contemporary families. While research has been conducted on family meals over the last three decades, there is no explicit investigation of the experiences and practices of family meals over this time. Understanding the evolution of family meal practices across time is important for developing achievable expectations in relation to this ritual. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a diverse population of South Australian parents in the 1990s (n = 32) and with a separate population of parents in 2020 (n = 22) to gather their experiences of family meal practices. A comparative analysis, informed by grounded theory, was undertaken to identify similarities and differences in experiences across these two time periods. The results indicated stability in many family meal experiences across time, particularly in their value and significance in family life. Negotiations balancing time, cost, food preferences and responsibility persisted. The stability of family meal values and practices is important to consider when making recommendations, designing interventions and creating services targeting the family meal.

Indexed as

Ceremonial BehaviorFeeding BehaviorAustraliaFamilyGrounded TheoryHumansMealsfamily mealfood provisionfood workgrounded theorytime comparison

Identifiers

PMID37791593
PMCPMC10548410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.