Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791440›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023

First 10 days after the 6th of February 2023 earthquake disaster: experience of an orthopedic clinic on the border of the disaster zone.

Zeynel Mert Asfuroğlu, Selçuk Fuat Gökosmanoğulları, Mehmet Colak, Cengiz Yilmaz, Metin Manouchehr Eskandari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Orthopedic trauma management in pediatric earthquake victims: a single-center experience from the 2023 Türkiye disaster.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeynel Mert AsfuroğluDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin-Türkiye.
Selçuk Fuat GökosmanoğullarıDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin-Türkiye.
Mehmet ColakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin-Türkiye.
Cengiz YilmazDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin-Türkiye.
Metin Manouchehr EskandariDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin-Türkiye.
Mersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe earthquake disaster that occurred on February 06, 2023, caused serious destruction and loss of life in the south of Türkiye. The purpose of this article consisting of two interconnected parts is to report the experience of our orthopedics clinic, which is located just on the border of the disaster area. The subject of the first part of the study is the characteristics of ortho-pedic traumas in earthquake victims and the treatment methods applied. The subject of the second part is the disaster work plan of the clinic and its consequences in practice.

methodsFor the first step, descriptive information, diagnoses, and treatment methods of 204 earthquake victims who were treated by our clinic in the first 10 days after the disaster were compiled from the archives. In terms of the second phase of the study, an in-clinic work plan was created on the morning of the 1st day of the disaster. The teams and working hours in the emergency department, inpatient service, and operating room were determined. Hospital management and other clinics were contacted and hospital facilities were organized for orthopedic trauma victims.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 42.3 years. Among the age groups, the smallest group was children under 10 years old (6.4% of all patients). 132 of the patients had at least one fracture in 135 extremities. Most of the injuries involved the lower extrem-ity. 66 patients had crush injury with or without fracture. 181 orthopedic surgical procedures were performed in 144 patients. The most common operations were internal fracture fixation and debridement. The most used implant was the plate-screw combination. Thanks to the in-clinic work plan and the in-hospital assistance and allocation of facilities, we did not experience serious problems in the hospitalization, surgery, and post-operative follow-ups of the patients. Although we received numerous offers of assistance from external institutions, this was not possible due to bureaucratic obstacles. Among our most important problems were the shortage of sterilized powered surgical drills and the lack of a dynamic patient information database.

conclusionOrthopedic clinics should prepare their in-clinic work plans for earthquake disasters and develop their facilities. In order not to encounter bureaucratic obstacles in emergency assistance, orthopedic clinics in different risk regions should be formally matched beforehand. A patient database table that clinical staff can access and revise using their smartphones facilitates the follow-up of large numbers of simultaneously hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningDisastersEarthquakesFractures, BoneAdultChildFracture Fixation, InternalHumans

Identifiers

PMID37791440
PMCPMC10644084
OpenAlexW4387325977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.