Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791275›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

CCS-UNet: a cross-channel spatial attention model for accurate retinal vessel segmentation.

Yong-Fei Zhu, Xiang Xu, Xue-Dian Zhang, Min-Shan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong-Fei ZhuShanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Optics System, College of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Xiang XuShanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Optics System, College of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Xue-Dian ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Optics System, College of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Min-Shan JiangShanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Optics System, College of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4669-1025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise segmentation of retinal vessels plays an important role in computer-assisted diagnosis. Deep learning models have been applied to retinal vessel segmentation, but the efficacy is limited by the significant scale variation of vascular structures and the intricate background of retinal images. This paper supposes a cross-channel spatial attention U-Net (CCS-UNet) for accurate retinal vessel segmentation. In comparison to other models based on U-Net, our model employes a ResNeSt block for the encoder-decoder architecture. The block has a multi-branch structure that enables the model to extract more diverse vascular features. It facilitates weight distribution across channels through the incorporation of soft attention, which effectively aggregates contextual information in vascular images. Furthermore, we suppose an attention mechanism within the skip connection. This mechanism serves to enhance feature integration across various layers, thereby mitigating the degradation of effective information. It helps acquire cross-channel information and enhance the localization of regions of interest, ultimately leading to improved recognition of vascular structures. In addition, the feature fusion module (FFM) module is used to provide semantic information for a more refined vascular segmentation map. We evaluated CCS-UNet based on five benchmark retinal image datasets, DRIVE, CHASEDB1, STARE, IOSTAR and HRF. Our proposed method exhibits superior segmentation efficacy compared to other state-of-the-art techniques with a global accuracy of 0.9617/0.9806/0.9766/0.9786/0.9834 and AUC of 0.9863/0.9894/0.9938/0.9902/0.9855 on DRIVE, CHASEDB1, STARE, IOSTAR and HRF respectively. Ablation studies are also performed to evaluate the the relative contributions of different architectural components. Our proposed model is potential for diagnostic aid of retinal diseases.

Identifiers

PMID37791275
PMCPMC10545190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.