ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Measurements of slow tissue dynamics with short-separation speckle contrast optical spectroscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed neural network for mapping vascular and tissue dynamics using laser speckle contrast imaging.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Mapping of blood flow and slow speckle tissue dynamics using laser speckle contrast imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Optical, contact-free assessment of brain tissue stiffness and neurodegeneration.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Dynamic light scattering and laser speckle contrast imaging of the brain: theory of the spatial and temporal statistics of speckle pattern evolution.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Validation of the Openwater wearable optical system: cerebral hemodynamic monitoring during a breath-hold maneuver.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Neurophotonics: a comprehensive review, current challenges and future trends.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) measures 2D maps of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in small animal brains such as mice. The contrast measured in LSCI also includes the static and slow-varying components that contain information about brain tissue dynamics. But these components are less studied as compared to the fast dynamics of CBF. In traditional wide-field LSCI, the contrast measured in the tissue is largely contaminated by neighboring blood vessels, which reduces the sensitivity to these static and slow components. Our goal is to enhance the sensitivity of the contrast to static and slow tissue dynamics and test models to quantify the characteristics of these components. To achieve this, we have developed a short-separation speckle contrast optical spectroscopy (ss-SCOS) system by implementing point illumination and point detection using multi-mode fiber arrays to enhance the static and slow components in speckle contrast measurements as compared to traditional wide-field LSCI (WF-LSCI). We observed larger fractions of the static and slow components when measured in the tissue using ss-SCOS than in traditional LSCI for the same animal and region of interest. We have also established models to obtain the fractions of the static and slow components and quantify the decorrelation time constants of the intensity auto-correlation function for both fast blood flow and slower tissue dynamics. Using ss-SCOS, we demonstrate the variations of fast and slow brain dynamics in animals before and post-stroke, as well as within an hour post-euthanasia. This technique establishes the foundation to measure brain tissue dynamics other than CBF, such as intracellular motility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.