ArticleAJPM focus2022
Assessing Intersectional Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening by Disability Status, Race, and Ethnicity.
Article in AJPM focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Yoga on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Quality of Life Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2025Trial
- Cervical Cancer Screening Overuse Among Women With and Without Disability in the U.S. From 2007 to 2016.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010-2019.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Correlation analysis on risk factors for cervical cancer in perimenopausal women.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Women with Disabilities: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in Chile.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Principles for Service Delivery: Best Practices for Cervical Screening for Women with Disabilities.International journal of women's health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Separate bodies of research have studied disparities by disability status and by race or ethnicity in receipt of cervical cancer screening. Much less is known about how these disparities intersect. The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in compliance with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for Pap testing in age-eligible women at the intersection of disability and race or ethnicity. Methods: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component deidentified public data files pooled for years 2007-2016, using a modified Poisson regression analysis to compute prevalence ratios for being up to date with Pap testing by disability status and race or ethnicity. We also calculated predicted marginal proportions adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic covariates. Results: The analytic sample included 68,507 women with nonmissing covariates; 15.6% had a disability. Overall, the proportion current with Pap testing was significantly lower among women with disabilities than among those without disabilities (82.1% vs 88.6%, Conclusions: Our results extend previous research focused separately on disability or race and ethnicity. Women with disabilities in all racial and ethnic groups fell short of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.