Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791238›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2022

High Blood Pressure Reduction, Health Insurance Status, and Social Deprivation Index in U.S. Community Health Centers.

Beverly B Green, Annie E Larson, Nathalie Huguet, Heather Angier, Steele Valenzuela, Miguel Marino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly B GreenKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Annie E LarsonResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon.
Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Heather AngierDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Steele ValenzuelaDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health & Science University · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USOchin · US

Funding

Evaluating Control of Hypertension - Effect of Social Determinants (ECHOES)R01HL136575 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lack of health insurance is a risk factor for uncontrolled hypertension, but it is unknown whether health insurance or neighborhood-level social deprivation is associated with greater reductions in blood pressure over time. Methods: We estimated the association of health insurance and social deprivation index on blood pressure reduction over time using electronic health record data from 2012 to 2017. We included patients aged 19-64 years with an initial systolic blood pressure ≥150 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg and ≥1 additional visit from 93 community health centers in states that expanded Medicaid in 2014. Results: We included 66,207 patients: 20.1% uninsured, 64.8% publicly insured, and 15.1% privately insured. Adjusting for patient characteristics and baseline blood pressure, systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure declined over the study period by 21.3/11.2 mmHg, 22.0/11.4 mmHg, and 21.1/10.7 mmHg among uninsured, publicly insured, and privately insured individuals, respectively. There were small but significantly greater reductions in systolic blood pressure among patients with public insurance than among those who were uninsured (difference= -1.3, 95% CI= -1.6, -1.0) but none associated with social deprivation index. There were no differences in diastolic blood pressure reductions over time by insurance status or social deprivation index. Blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) was significantly greater among publicly or commercially insured individuals than among uninsured individuals (51.7%, 51.5%, 44.6% respectively, both comparisons Conclusions: Reductions in blood pressure were large but mostly not associated with insurance type or social deprivation index. Additional research is needed to understand the factors that lead to blood pressure reduction in community health center settings.

Indexed as

blood pressurecommunity health centershealth insuranceHypertensionneighborhood characteristicssocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID37791238
PMCPMC10546572
OpenAlexW4289783162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.