ReviewCureus2023
Outcomes of Neonatal Resuscitation With and Without an Intact Umbilical Cord: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umbilical cord management in newborn resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around the world, very few babies require a more intensive resuscitative effort for stabilization. The optimal timing of an intact umbilical cord to help with resuscitation is controversial. Our objective in the review is to compare the outcomes of neonatal resuscitation with and without an intact umbilical cord. A search of six electronic database libraries was explored for data released between 2014 and 2023. A manual search of secondary references in relevant studies was also performed. Studies focused only on randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of neonatal resuscitation with and without an intact umbilical cord at any gestational age. Two reviewers retrieved data for relevant outcomes and independently evaluated trial quality and eligibility. Mortality rate and APGAR (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) scores were noted as common in the two studies. Four randomized control trials were assessed for the impact of delayed cord clamping on neonates. One study focused on neurodevelopmental outcomes and noted significant improvement. Other studies noted delayed clamping as beneficial for improving oxygen saturation, APGAR score, and mortality rate. The meta-analysis included three controlled trials with a total of 528 babies and tested the effects of clamping the umbilical cord either late (n = 264) or early (n = 264). The heterogeneity of mortality and APGAR score at 5 minutes were not significant, which may be because only two studies of each case were available to compare. We concluded that very few studies are available to identify a significant impact of delayed cord clamping in neonates. However, delayed clamping for up to 5 minutes is noted as beneficial to the newborn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.