Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791137›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

Making decisions "in the dark": Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid-19.

Urvashi Vaid, Henriette Lundgren, Karen E Watkins, Deborah Ziring, Grace A Alcid, Victoria J Marsick, Dimitrios Papanagnou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Urvashi VaidDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Henriette LundgrenHuman Resource Development, Department of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA.
Karen E WatkinsDepartment of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA.
Deborah ZiringDepartment of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Grace A AlcidAdult Learning and Leadership Program, Department of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA.
Victoria J MarsickDepartment of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA.
Dimitrios PapanagnouDepartment of Emergency Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-8371
Thomas Jefferson University · USColumbia University · USNew Leaders · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. The authors' specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontline physicians who had to navigate a CLE replete with uncertainty and complexity with the future goal of creating experiences for medical students that would simulate IIL and use uncertainty as a catalyst for learning. Method: Using a modified constructivist, grounded theory approach, we describe physicians' IIL while working during times of heightened uncertainty. Using the critical incident technique, we conducted 45-min virtual interviews with seven emergency department (ED) and five intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, who worked during the height of the pandemic. The authors transcribed and restoried each interview before applying inductive, comparative analysis to identify patterns, assertions, and organizing themes. Results: Findings showed that the burden of decision making for physicians was influenced by the physical, emotional, relational, and situational context of the CLE. The themes that emerged for decision making and IIL were interdependent. Prominent among the patterns for decision making were ways to simplify the problem by applying prior knowledge, using pattern recognition, and cross-checking with team members. Patterns for IIL emerged through trial and error, which included thoughtful experimentation, consulting alternative sources of information, accumulating knowledge, and "poking at the periphery" of clinical practice. Conclusions: Complexity and uncertainty are rife in clinical practice and this study made visible decision-making patterns and IIL approaches that can be built into formal curricula. Making implicit uncertainty explicit by recognizing it, naming it, and practicing navigating it may better prepare learners for the uncertainty posed by the clinical practice environment.

Indexed as

clinical learning environmentCovid‐19decision‐makinginformal and incidental learninguncertainty

Identifiers

PMID37791137
PMCPMC10543116
OpenAlexW4387262444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.