Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791133›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Polish validation of the Transplant Effects Questionnaire.

Grażyna Dębska, Irena Milaniak, Alicja Dębska-Ślizień, Filip Gołkowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grażyna DębskaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej FryczModrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland.
Irena MilaniakFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej FryczModrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland.
Alicja Dębska-ŚlizieńDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Gdansk Medical University, Gdańsk, Poland.
Filip GołkowskiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej FryczModrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland.
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University · PLGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Transplant Effects Questionnaire (TxEQ) assesses specific recipients' reactions to receiving a transplanted organ, including worry about the transplant, Guilt regarding the donor, disclosure of having undergone transplantation, adherence to medical treatment, and responsibility to the donor, family, or medical staff. Poland has no standardized tool for evaluating the emotional reaction to transplantation. The study aimed to assess the basic psychometric properties, such as the reliability and validity of the Polish translation of TxEQ-PL. Materials and methods: The study involved 84 patients after kidney transplantation. The average age of the subjects was 49.87 years (±15.27). The study used the diagnostic survey method, the Polish versions of the Results: The TxEQ-PL version has satisfactory internal consistency for each subscale ( Conclusion: TxEQ-PL is useful for assessing emotional reactions to organ transplantation. The tool has a factor structure identical to the original English version and comparable psychometric properties.

Indexed as

emotional responsekidneytransplantTransplant Effects Questionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID37791133
PMCPMC10544967
OpenAlexW4386849822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.