Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37791096›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2023

Comparative Study of Guanidine-, Acetamidine- and Urea-Based Chloroaluminate Electrolytes for an Aluminum Battery.

Iwan Sumarlan, Anand Kunverji, Anthony J Lucio, A Robert Hillman, Karl S Ryder

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Guanidine-Based Chloroaluminate Electrolyte: A Candidate for a Rechargeable Aluminum Battery.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Iwan SumarlanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Mataram, Jl. Majapahit. No. 62, Mataram 83115, Lombok, Indonesia.
Anand KunverjiCentre for Sustainable Materials Processing, School of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.
Anthony J LucioCentre for Sustainable Materials Processing, School of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.
A Robert HillmanCentre for Sustainable Materials Processing, School of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.
Karl S RyderCentre for Sustainable Materials Processing, School of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-6884
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminum-based batteries are a promising alternative to lithium-ion as they are considered to be low-cost and more friendly to the environment. In addition, aluminum is abundant and evenly distributed across the globe. Many studies and Al battery prototypes use imidazolium chloroaluminate electrolytes because of their good rheological and electrochemical performance. However, these electrolytes are very expensive, and so cost is a barrier to industrial scale-up. A urea-based electrolyte, AlCl

Identifiers

PMID37791096
PMCPMC10544989
OpenAlexW4386761063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.