ArticleInterspeech2023
Remote Assessment for ALS using Multimodal Dialog Agents: Data Quality, Feasibility and Task Compliance.
Article in Interspeech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Listener effort measures clinically meaningful change of dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Introduction to the Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the feasibility, task compliance and audiovisual data quality of a multimodal dialog-based solution for remote assessment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). 53 people with ALS and 52 healthy controls interacted with Tina, a cloud-based conversational agent, in performing speech tasks designed to probe various aspects of motor speech function while their audio and video was recorded. We rated a total of 250 recordings for audio/video quality and participant task compliance, along with the relative frequency of different issues observed. We observed excellent compliance (98%) and audio (95.2%) and visual quality rates (84.8%), resulting in an overall yield of 80.8% recordings that were both compliant and of high quality. Furthermore, recording quality and compliance were not affected by level of speech severity and did not differ significantly across end devices. These findings support the utility of dialog systems for remote monitoring of speech in ALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.