Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790949›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2023

Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Change in African Americans: Implementation Phase Results of the EPICS Cluster RCT.

Benjamin E Ansa, Ernest Alema-Mensah, Joyce Q Sheats, Mohamed Mubasher, Tabia Henry Akintobi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01805622 (Efficacy to Effectiveness Transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01805622 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy to Effectiveness Transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorMorehouse School of MedicineRan2012 to 2017Enrolled7,200ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsActive Arm #1, #2, Passive Arm #1, #2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin E AnsaInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, Augusta Georgia.
Ernest Alema-MensahDepartment of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Joyce Q SheatsInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, Augusta Georgia.
Mohamed MubasherDepartment of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tabia Henry AkintobiDepartment of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA166785 · NCI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOBBS, JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: African Americans are disproportionately affected by mortality risk for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to determine the most effective educational approach of 4 study arms that enhances the likelihood of pursuing subsequent colorectal cancer screening, and to identify the associated factors. Methods: Age-eligible adults (N=2,877) were recruited to participate in a cluster randomized control dissemination and intervention implementation trial titled Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening. The project began in May 2012 and ended in March 2017 (the implementation phase lasted 36 months). Educational sessions were conducted through 16 community coalitions that were randomized into 1 of 4 conditions: website access (to facilitator training materials and toolkits) without technical assistance, website access with technical assistance, in-person training (provided by research staff and website access) without technical assistance, and in-person training with technical assistance. A follow-up to determine participant CRC screening was conducted 3 months later. Results: Compared with the website access with technical assistance intervention group, 2 groups, in-person training with technical assistance and without technical assistance, indicated significantly higher odds for obtaining colorectal cancer screening (OR=1.31; 95% CI=1.04, 1.64; Conclusions: The importance of in-person interactions, local coalitions, and community contexts may play a key role for successfully increasing colorectal cancer screening rates among African Americans as reflected through this study. The integration of telehealth and use of other virtual technologies to engage the public in research have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic and should be assessed to determine their impact on the degree to which in-person interventions are significantly more effective when compared with solely web-assisted ones. Trial registration: The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01805622.

Indexed as

African Americancolorectal cancereducationrandomized controlled trialscreening

Identifiers

PMID37790949
PMCPMC10546549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.