Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Liver metastasis affects progression pattern during immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in gastric cancer.

Iori Motoo, Takayuki Ando, Takeru Hamashima, Shinya Kajiura, Miho Sakumura, Yuko Ueda, Aiko Murayama, Kohei Ogawa, Kenichiro Tsukada, Akira Ueda and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Impact of liver metastasis on immunotherapy in gastric carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Iori MotooThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Takayuki AndoThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Takeru HamashimaDepartment of Pathology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Shinya KajiuraThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Miho SakumuraThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yuko UedaThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Aiko MurayamaThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Kohei OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Kenichiro TsukadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kouseiren Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Akira UedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toyama Red Cross Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Nobuhiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jouetsu Sogo Hospital, Jouetsu, Japan.
Naokatsu NakadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Itoigawa Sogo Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan.
Koji NakashimaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Ayumu HosokawaThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Ichiro YasudaThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
University of Toyama · JPUniversity of Miyazaki Hospital · JPKouseiren Takaoka Hospital · JPMiwa Hospital · JPToyama Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is heterogeneous at each metastatic site, and tumor progression pattern is associated with survival; however, it remains unclear in gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, we aimed to clarify the progression pattern in response to ICIs in patients with GC, and we analyzed its mechanism focusing on the intratumoral immune cells. Methods: Patients who received ICIs were retrospectively classified into non-systemic and systemic progression groups based on their radiological assessments. Moreover, the best percentage change in target lesions from each organ was compared. Results: Among 148 patients, the non-systemic progression group showed a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with the systemic progression group (median, 5.6 months vs. 3.3 months; HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.32-0.89; p = 0.012). Poor performance status (HR, 1.73, 95%CI, 1.00-2.87) and systemic progression (HR, 3.09, 95%CI, 1.95-4.82) were associated with OS. Of all metastatic sites, the liver showed the poorest percentage change, and liver metastasis (OR, 2.99, 95%CI, 1.04-8.58) was associated with systemic progression. Hence, intratumoral CD8+ T-cell density was lower in patients with liver metastasis than in those without liver metastasis after ICIs, although the density of CD4+ T-cells (Th1, Th17, and Treg) and CD163+ cells (TAM) were not significantly different. Conclusion: The new progression pattern was associated with OS in GC. Liver metastasis may be a predictive factor of systemic progression during ICIs by regulating intratumoral CD8+ T-cells.

Indexed as

gastric cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorliver metastasisprogression patterntumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID37790758
PMCPMC10542891
OpenAlexW4386839314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.