ArticleAJPM focus2023
Predicting Patients Requiring Treatment for Depression in the Postpartum Period Using Common Electronic Medical Record Data Available Antepartum.
Article in AJPM focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the prevention and early detection of postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Factors associated with postpartum depression symptoms following antepartum hospitalization.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Risk-Stratified Screening for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Integrating Sexual Function, Self-Esteem, and Psychosocial Context.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI for Detecting and Predicting Postpartum Depression: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Stratifying Risk for Postpartum Depression at Time of Hospital Discharge.The American journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Predictive Analysis of Postpartum Depression Using Machine Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perinatal mental health care goes digital: Opportunities for digital health to revolutionize the care delivery for healthier pregnancies and outcomes.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Evaluating Bias-Mitigated Predictive Models of Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Digital Training for Nurses and Midwives to Improve Treatment for Women with Postpartum Depression and Protect Neonates: A Dynamic Bibliometric Review Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Depression requiring treatment in the postpartum period significantly impacts maternal and neonatal health. Although preventive management of depression in pregnancy has been shown to decrease the negative impacts, current methods for identifying at-risk patients are insufficient. Given the complexity of the diagnosis and interplay of clinical/demographic factors, we tested whether machine learning techniques can accurately identify at-risk patients in the postpartum period. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of the NIH Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be, which enrolled 10,038 nulliparous people. The primary outcome was depression in the postpartum period. We constructed and optimized 4 machine learning models using distributed random forest modeling and 1 logistic regression model on the basis of the NIH Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be dataset. Model 1 utilized only readily obtainable sociodemographic data. Model 2 added maternal prepregnancy mental health data. Model 3 utilized recursive feature elimination to construct a parsimonious model. Model 4 further titrated the input data to simplify prepregnancy mental health variables. The logistic regression model used the same input data as Model 3 as a proof of concept. Results: Of 8,454 births, 338 (4%) were complicated by depression in the postpartum period. Model 3 was the highest performing, showing the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.91 (±0.02). Models 1-3 identified the 9 variables most predictive of depression hierarchically, ranging from depression history (highest), history of mental health condition, recent psychiatric medication use, BMI, income, age, anxiety history, education, and preparedness for pregnancy (lowest). In Model 4, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve remained at 0.79 (±0.05). Conclusions: Postpartum depression can be predicted with high accuracy for individual patients using antepartum information commonly found in electronic medical records. In addition, baseline mental health status and sociodemographic factors have a larger role in the postpartum period than previously understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.