Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790643›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2023

Pilot Study of the Feasibility of a Worksite Plant-Based Diabetes Prevention Program.

Zainab Almousa, Isobel R Contento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zainab AlmousaDepartment of Community Medicine and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait.
Isobel R ContentoTeachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a worksite diabetes prevention program-Beat Diabetes-on the basis of a plant-based diet and encouragement of physical activity. Methods: This was a mixed-methods pilot study using a 1-group pretest‒post-test design. The participants were university employees. A 13-week group-based intervention adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program to emphasize a plant-based diet and on the basis of the Health Action Process Approach. Program implementation and participant acceptability were assessed through surveys, weekly documentation of the process, and individual interviews. Consumption of healthy and less healthy plant-based foods and animal-based foods, physical activity, and Health Action Process Approach‒based psychosocial determinants were measured through questionnaires before and after the program, as was blood glucose. Weights were measured weekly. Results: A total of 14 participants were enrolled, with 93% retention. Program implementation was feasible and highly acceptable to participants and also resulted in significant improvements in weight, healthy relative to less healthy plant-based and animal-based foods, vigorous physical activity, blood glucose, and psychosocial determinants of behavior change. Conclusions: On the basis of our pilot study, conducting a worksite plant-based diabetes prevention program was feasible and acceptable and elicited positive changes in physiologic, behavioral, and psychosocial variables related to the risk of diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetesdietlifestyleplant-basedprevention

Identifiers

PMID37790643
PMCPMC10546524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.