Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790642›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2023

Lung Cancer Screening Among U.S. Military Veterans by Health Status and Race and Ethnicity, 2017-2020: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study.

Alison S Rustagi, Amy L Byers, James K Brown, Natalie Purcell, Christopher G Slatore, Salomeh Keyhani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04574518 (Teachable Moment to Opt-out of Tobacco), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04574518 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Teachable Moment to Opt-out of Tobacco (TeaM OUT): A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2026Enrolled223ConditionsSolitary Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules, Tobacco UseArmsTeaM OUT Intervention, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing a systems-focused tool for modeling lung cancer screening resource needs.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison S RustagiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
Amy L ByersDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
James K BrownDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Natalie PurcellIntegrative Health, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
Christopher G SlatoreNational Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.
Salomeh KeyhaniDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

CSRD VA IK6 CX002386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Veterans are at high risk for lung cancer and are an important group for lung cancer screening. Previous research suggests that lung cancer screening may not be reaching healthier and/or non-White individuals, who stand to benefit most from lung cancer screening. We sought to test whether lung cancer screening is associated with poor health and/or race and ethnicity among veterans. Methods: This cross-sectional, population-based study included veterans eligible for lung cancer screening (aged 55-79 years, ≥30 pack-year smoking history, current smokers or quit within 15 years, no previous lung cancer) in the 2017-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. Exposures were (1) Results: Of 3,376 lung cancer screening-eligible veterans representing an underlying population of 866,000 individuals, 20.3% (95% CI=17.3, 23.6) had poor health, and 13.7% (95% CI=10.6, 17.5) identified as non-White. Poor health was strongly associated with lung cancer screening (adjusted RR=1.64, 95% CI=1.06, 2.27); one third of veterans screened for lung cancer would not qualify for a pivotal lung cancer screening trial in terms of health. Marked racial disparities were observed among veterans: after adjustment, non-White veterans were 67% less likely to report lung cancer screening than White veterans (adjusted RR=0.33, 95% CI=0.11, 0.66). Conclusions: Lung cancer screening is correlated with poorer health and White race/ethnicity among veterans, which may undermine its population-level effectiveness. These results highlight the need to promote lung cancer screening, especially for healthier and/or non-White veterans, an important group of Americans for lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

ethnicityhealth disparitieslung cancerLung cancer screeningraceveterans

Identifiers

PMID37790642
PMCPMC10546514
OpenAlexW4319764837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.