ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Examining the U-shaped relationship of sleep duration and systolic blood pressure with risk of cardiovascular events using a novel recursive gradient scanning model.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Chronic Insomnia and Stroke Risk-A Real Bidirectional Issue.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Discretizing multiple continuous predictors with U-shaped relationships with lnOR: introducing the recursive gradient scanning method in clinical and epidemiological research.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- A U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and tinnitus incidence: analysis of 13,871 participants from NHANES.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025Article
- Sleep and periodontal health.Periodontology 2000 · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies have suggested U-shaped relationships between sleep duration and systolic blood pressure (SBP) with risks of many cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), but the cut-points that separate high-risk and low-risk groups have not been confirmed. We aimed to examine the U-shaped relationships between sleep duration, SBP, and risks of CVDs and confirm the optimal cut-points for sleep duration and SBP. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on NHANES 2007-2016 data, which included a nationally representative sample of participants. The maximum equal-odds ratio (OR) method was implemented to obtain optimal cut-points for each continuous independent variable. Then, a novel "recursive gradient scanning method" was introduced for discretizing multiple non-monotonic U-shaped independent variables. Finally, a multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict critical risk factors associated with CVDs after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 26,691 participants (48.66% were male) were eligible for the current study with an average age of 49.43 ± 17.69 years. After adjusting for covariates, compared with an intermediate range of sleep duration (6.5-8.0 h per day) and SBP (95-120 mmHg), upper or lower values were associated with a higher risk of CVDs [adjusted OR (95% confidence interval) was 1.20 (1.04-1.40) for sleep duration and 1.17 (1.01-1.36) for SBP]. Conclusions: This study indicates U-shaped relationships between SBP, sleep duration, and risks of CVDs. Both short and long duration of sleep/higher and lower BP are predictors of cardiovascular outcomes. Estimated total sleep duration of 6.5-8.0 h per day/SBP of 95-120 mmHg is associated with lower risk of CVDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.