Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790545›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Predictions of the Pharmaco- and Population Dynamics of Heteroresistance.

Bruce R Levin, Brandon A Berryhill, Teresa Gil-Gil, Joshua A Manuel, Andrew P Smith, Jacob E Choby, Dan I Andersson, David S Weiss, Fernando Baquero

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bruce R LevinDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Brandon A BerryhillDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Teresa Gil-GilDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Joshua A ManuelDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Andrew P SmithDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Jacob E ChobyEmory Antibiotic Resistance Center; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-75123, Sweden.
David S WeissEmory Antibiotic Resistance Center; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Fernando BaqueroServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, and Centro de Investigación Médica en Red, Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Madrid, Spain.
Emory University · USEmory and Henry College · USInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUppsala University · SE

Funding

Single Cell Analysis Core (Core C)U19AI158080 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2021 to 2025
$10.9M
Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Population and Evolutionary Dynamics of Bacteria and Bacteriophage.R35GM136407 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI158080NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are considered one of the most important contributions to clinical medicine in the last 100 years. Due to the use and overuse of these drugs, there have been increasing frequencies of infections with resistant pathogens. One form of resistance, heteroresistance, is particularly problematic; pathogens appear sensitive to a drug by common susceptibility tests. However, upon exposure to the antibiotic, resistance rapidly ascends, and treatment fails. To quantitatively explore the processes contributing to the emergence and ascent of resistance during treatment and the waning of resistance following cessation of treatment, we develop two distinct mathematical and computer-simulations models of heteroresistance. In our analysis of the properties of these models, we consider the factors that determine the response to antibiotic-mediated selection. In one model, heteroresistance is progressive, with each resistant state sequentially generating a higher resistance level. In the other model, heteroresistance is non-progressive, with a susceptible population directly generating populations with different resistance levels. The conditions where resistance will ascend in the progressive model are narrower than those of the non-progressive model. The rates of reversion from the resistant to the sensitive states are critically dependent on the transition rates and the fitness cost of resistance. Our results demonstrate that the standard test used to identify heteroresistance is insufficient. The predictions of our models are consistent with empirical results. Our results demand a reevaluation of the definition and criteria employed to identify heteroresistance. We recommend the definition of heteroresistance should include a consideration of the rate of return to susceptibility.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ResistanceHeteroresistanceMathematical ModelingMicrobiologyPharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID37790545
PMCPMC10542493
OpenAlexW4386965672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.