Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790533›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Automated customization of large-scale spiking network models to neuronal population activity.

Shenghao Wu, Chengcheng Huang, Adam Snyder, Matthew Smith, Brent Doiron, Byron Yu

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shenghao WuNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chengcheng HuangCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adam SnyderDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Matthew SmithNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Brent DoironDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Byron YuNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Validating Theoretical Models with Neurophysiology and OptogeneticsU19NS107613 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2018 to 2022
$16.7M
Shaping Neural Population Dynamics to Facilitate LearningR01HD071686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATISTA, AARON PAUL, CHASE, STEVEN M · 2011 to 2021
$3.7M
Memory Formation in Motor CortexR01NS129584 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aaron Paul Batista, Steven M Chase · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Interrogating and Perturbing Neural DynamicsR01NS105318 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aaron Paul Batista, Steven M Chase · 2017 to 2026
$2.3M
Understanding feedforward and feedback signaling between neuronal populationsRF1NS127107 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KOHN, ADAM, MACHENS, CHRISTIAN · 2022 to 2022
$2.0M
Topological bridges between circuits, models, and behaviorR01NS121913 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COHEN, MARLENE ROCHELLE, HUANG, CHENGCHENG · 2024 to 2025
$1.9M
CRCNS: Modulating Neural Population Interactions between Cortical AreasR01MH118929 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, MATTHEW A, YU, BYRON M. · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Dynamic population codes for perceptionR01EY029250 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, MATTHEW A · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Neuronal population dynamics within and across cortical areasR01EB026953 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DOIRON, BRENT D., SMITH, MATTHEW A · 2018 to 2020
$1.0M
Identifying selective visual attention mechanisms through high-dimensional analysis.K99EY025768 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2015 to 2016
$196k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY025768NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029250NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026953NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071686NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118929NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105318NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121913NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129584NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS127107NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding brain function is facilitated by constructing computational models that accurately reproduce aspects of brain activity. Networks of spiking neurons capture the underlying biophysics of neuronal circuits, yet the dependence of their activity on model parameters is notoriously complex. As a result, heuristic methods have been used to configure spiking network models, which can lead to an inability to discover activity regimes complex enough to match large-scale neuronal recordings. Here we propose an automatic procedure, Spiking Network Optimization using Population Statistics (SNOPS), to customize spiking network models that reproduce the population-wide covariability of large-scale neuronal recordings. We first confirmed that SNOPS accurately recovers simulated neural activity statistics. Then, we applied SNOPS to recordings in macaque visual and prefrontal cortices and discovered previously unknown limitations of spiking network models. Taken together, SNOPS can guide the development of network models and thereby enable deeper insight into how networks of neurons give rise to brain function.

Identifiers

PMID37790533
PMCPMC10542160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.