Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790487›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

User Acceptability and Perceived Impact of a Mobile Interactive Education and Support Group Intervention to Improve Postnatal Health Care in Northern India: A Qualitative Study.

Valentina Cox, Preetika Sharma, Garima Singh Verma, Navneet Gill, Nadia G Diamond-Smith, Mona Duggal, Vijay Kumar, Rashmi Bagga, Jasmeet Kaur, Pushpendra Singh and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina CoxUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Preetika SharmaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research.
Garima Singh VermaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research.
Navneet GillPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research.
Nadia G Diamond-SmithUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Mona DuggalPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research.
Vijay KumarSurvival of Women and Children Foundation.
Rashmi BaggaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research.
Jasmeet KaurIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi.
Pushpendra SinghIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi.
Alison M El AyadiUniversity of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

Development and Pilot Test of an mHealth Interactive Education and Social Support Intervention for Improving Postnatal HealthR21HD101786 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAMOND-SMITH, NADIA GRIFFI, EL AYADI, ALISON M · 2020 to 2021
$401k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD101786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postnatal care, crucial for preventing and assessing complications after birth, remains low in India. An interactive mHealth community-based postnatal intervention was implemented to promote healthy maternal behaviors through knowledge and social support in rural Northern India. However, there is limited information on how virtual health interventions in resource-constrained settings are perceived by the users and which elements influence their engagement and sustained participation. Objective: We explored the user perceptions of acceptability and impact of a virtual interactive maternal and child health intervention pilot tested in Punjab State, India, including their perspectives on barriers and facilitators to engage with this intervention. Methods: This qualitative study was embedded within extensive mixed-method research, and oriented by the Realist Evaluation approach. Sixteen participants were recruited from the parent study. They were identified by purposive sampling to cover diverse levels of attendance and engagement with the intervention. In-depth interviews were conducted by phone. Following translation, a framework analysis was completed to search for the main themes. Feedback was requested from intervention moderators during the process to prioritize local interpretation. Results: Study participants reported overall satisfaction with the intervention. The mothers appreciated the educational material provided and the communication with other participants and health professionals. Across context, intervention, and actor domains, the barriers most commented on were network and connectivity challenges, lack of time due to household responsibilities, and feeling uncomfortable sharing personal experiences. Family buy-in and support were fundamental for overcoming the high domestic workload and baby care. Another facilitator mentioned was moderators' guidance on using the different intervention modalities. Regarding perceived impact, participants shared that MeSSSSage increased their capability and motivation to breastfeed, seek care as needed, and use contraception according to their preferences. Finally, participants suggested adding more topics to the educational content and adjusting the dynamics within the group calls to improve the intervention. Conclusions: This study identifies the high acceptability and perceived impact of a novel postnatal care program in a rural setting, including the users' perceived barriers to engaging with the intervention and possible solutions to overcome them. These findings enable refinement of the ongoing intervention, providing a more robust framing for its scalability and long-term sustainability. On a larger scale, conclusions from this research provide new insights and encouragement to global stakeholders who aspire to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries through mHealth.

Indexed as

antenatalgroup careIndiamHealthmobile phonepostnatalpostpartum

Identifiers

PMID37790487
PMCPMC10543439
OpenAlexW4386826447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.