Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790472›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive and early onset prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization and tumor spatial transcriptomics.

Trishna A Desai, Åsa K Hedman, Marios Dimitriou, Mine Koprulu, Sandy Figiel, Wencheng Yin, Mattias Johansson, Eleanor L Watts, Joshua R Atkins, Aleksandr V Sokolov and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Trishna A DesaiCancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Åsa K HedmanExternal Science and Innovation, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marios DimitriouExternal Science and Innovation, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mine KopruluMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sandy FigielUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wencheng YinUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mattias JohanssonGenomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Eleanor L WattsMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Joshua R AtkinsCancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aleksandr V SokolovDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience Uppsala University, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Helgi B SchiöthDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience Uppsala University, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Marc J GunterGenomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Konstantinos K TsilidisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom.
Richard M MartinPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Maik PietznerMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Claudia LangenbergMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ian G MillsUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alastair D LambUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anders MälarstigExternal Science and Innovation, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tim J KeyCancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PRACTICAL Consortium
Ruth C TravisCancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Karl Smith-ByrneCancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBPfizer (Sweden) · SECentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRQueen Mary University of London · GBUppsala University · SENational Cancer Institute · USUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25812Cancer Research UK 29017Cancer Research UK 29186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding the role of circulating proteins in prostate cancer risk can reveal key biological pathways and identify novel targets for cancer prevention. Methods: We investigated the association of 2,002 genetically predicted circulating protein levels with risk of prostate cancer overall, and of aggressive and early onset disease, using Results: We identified 20 proteins genetically linked to prostate cancer risk (14 for overall [8 specific], 7 for aggressive [3 specific], and 8 for early onset disease [2 specific]), of which a majority were novel and replicated. Among these were proteins associated with aggressive disease, such as PPA2 [Odds Ratio (OR) per 1 SD increment = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.54-2.93], PYY [OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.43-2.44] and PRSS3 [OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89], and those associated with early onset disease, including EHPB1 [OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.99-4.21], POGLUT3 [OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86] and TPM3 [OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64]. We confirm an inverse association of MSMB with prostate cancer overall [OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.80-0.82], and also find an inverse association with both aggressive [OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82-0.86] and early onset disease [OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.74]. Using spatial transcriptomics data, we identified MSMB as the genome-wide top-most predictive gene to distinguish benign regions from high grade cancer regions that had five-fold lower MSMB expression. Additionally, ten proteins that were associated with prostate cancer risk mapped to existing therapeutic interventions. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the importance of proteomics for improving our understanding of prostate cancer etiology and of opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions. Additionally, we demonstrate the added benefit of in-depth functional analyses to triangulate the role of risk proteins in the clinical aggressiveness of prostate tumors. Using these integrated methods, we identify a subset of risk proteins associated with aggressive and early onset disease as priorities for investigation for the future prevention and treatment of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

cis-pQTLplasmaProstate CancerproteinProteomics

Identifiers

PMID37790472
PMCPMC10543057
OpenAlexW4386953748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.