Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790417›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Generative Methods for Pediatric Genetics Education.

Rebekah L Waikel, Amna A Othman, Tanviben Patel, Suzanna Ledgister Hanchard, Ping Hu, Cedrik Tekendo-Ngongang, Dat Duong, Benjamin D Solomon

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebekah L WaikelMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Amna A OthmanMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Tanviben PatelMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Suzanna Ledgister HanchardMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ping HuMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Cedrik Tekendo-NgongangMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Dat DuongMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Benjamin D SolomonMedical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in an increasing number of areas, with recent interest in generative AI, such as using ChatGPT to generate programming code or DALL-E to make illustrations. We describe the use of generative AI in medical education. Specifically, we sought to determine whether generative AI could help train pediatric residents to better recognize genetic conditions. From publicly available images of individuals with genetic conditions, we used generative AI methods to create new images, which were checked for accuracy with an external classifier. We selected two conditions for study, Kabuki (KS) and Noonan (NS) syndromes, which are clinically important conditions that pediatricians may encounter. In this study, pediatric residents completed 208 surveys, where they each classified 20 images following exposure to one of 4 possible educational interventions, including with and without generative AI methods. Overall, we find that generative images perform similarly but appear to be slightly less helpful than real images. Most participants reported that images were useful, although real images were felt to be more helpful. We conclude that generative AI images may serve as an adjunctive educational tool, particularly for less familiar conditions, such as KS.

Identifiers

PMID37790417
PMCPMC10543060
OpenAlexW4385551533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.