ArticleJB & JS open access
An Algorithmic Approach to Understanding Osteoarthritic Knee Pain.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the algorithms: Challenges in predicting knee osteoarthritis pain from a machine learning point of view.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning classification models demonstrate high accuracy and clinical potential in radiograph interpretation in the arthroplasty clinical pathway: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritic knee pain is a complex phenomenon, and multiple factors, both within the knee and external to it, can contribute to how the patient perceives pain. We sought to determine how well a deep neural network could predict osteoarthritic knee pain and other symptoms solely from a single radiograph view. Methods: We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a 10-year observational study of patients with knee osteoarthritis. We paired >50,000 weight-bearing, posteroanterior knee radiographs with corresponding Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living subscores and used them to train a series of deep learning models to predict those scores solely from raw radiographic input. We created regression models for specific score predictions and classification models to predict whether the modeled KOOS subscore exceeded a range of thresholds. Results: The root-mean-square errors were 15.7 for KOOS pain, 13.1 for KOOS symptoms, and 14.2 for KOOS activities of daily living. Modeling was performed to predict whether pain was above or below given pain thresholds, and was able to predict extreme pain (KOOS pain < 40) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. Notably, the system was also able to correctly predict numerous cases where the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade assigned by the radiologist was 0 but patient pain was high, and cases where the KL grade was 4 but patient pain was low. Conclusions: A deep neural network can be trained to predict the osteoarthritic knee pain that a patient experienced and other symptoms with reasonable accuracy from a single posteroanterior view of the knee, even using low-resolution images. The system can predict pain and dysfunction that the traditional KL grade does not capture. Deep learning applied to raw imaging inputs holds promise for disentangling sources of pain within the knee from aggravating factors external to the knee. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.