Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790184›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Perspectives of researchers with lived experience in implementation science research: Opportunities to close the research-to-practice gap in substance use systems of care.

Camille C Cioffi, Patrick F Hibbard, Angela Hagaman, Martha Tillson, Noel Vest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camille C CioffiUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Patrick F HibbardOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.
Angela HagamanEast Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Martha TillsonUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Noel VestBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Supplement to Prevention Research Center: Parenting Among Women Who Are Opioid Users, Project 2P50DA048756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MACKIEWICZ SEGHETE, KRISTEN L · 2019 to 2023
$18.0M
Diversity Supplement: Building a Lasting Foundation to Advance Actionable Research on Recovery Support Services for High Risk Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder: The Initiative for JEAPR24DA051950 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI MCCART, MICHAEL R, SHEIDOW, ASHLI J · 2020 to 2025
$2.8M
Studies to Advance Recovery Supports (STARS) in Central AppalachiaR24DA051973 · NIDA · EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HORN, KIMBERLY A, PACK, ROBERT P · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA051950NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA051973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The field of implementation science acknowledges the importance of diversity within research teams including members from diverse disciplines and with lived expertise in practical implementation (e.g., administrators, front-line workers, patients/clients). Gaps remain in the successful implementation of proven substance use treatment interventions. Methods: This paper will outline the rationale for the purposeful inclusion of researchers with lived experience (RLE) related to substance use disorder (SUD) within implementation science research studies focused on improving SUD services. Results: We posit that researchers with such experience can help address research-to-practice gaps by (1) building strong community partnerships, (2) engaging in conversations around effective interventions through knowledge translation, (3) providing community-congruent approaches to evaluation, and (4) aiding in dissemination and sustainability efforts. Conclusions: We end by offering recommendations for researchers without lived experience as they intentionally collaborate with RLE.

Indexed as

community-based researchimplementation outcomesimplementation processresearchers with lived experiencesubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID37790184
PMCPMC10326466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.