Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790178›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Adaptation of the collaborative care model to integrate behavioral health care into a low-barrier HIV clinic.

Julia C Dombrowski, Scott Halliday, Judith I Tsui, Deepa Rao, Kenneth Sherr, Meena S Ramchandani, Ramona Emerson, Mark Fleming, Teagan Wood, Lydia Chwastiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia C DombrowskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Scott HallidayDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-6937
Judith I TsuiDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Deepa RaoDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kenneth SherrDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Meena S RamchandaniDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ramona EmersonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mark FlemingPublic Health - Seattle & King County, HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
Teagan WoodDepartment of Social Work, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lydia ChwastiakDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

University of Washington Developmental AIDS Research Center for Mental Health (UW ARCH)P30MH123248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMONI, JANE M. · 2021 to 2024
$5.8M
Collaborative Care Management for Integrated Mental Health and Substance Use Treatment in Low-Barrier HIV CareR34MH124625 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOMBROWSKI, JULIA COOK · 2020 to 2021
$678k
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH123248NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH124625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The collaborative care management (CoCM) model is an evidence-based intervention for integrating behavioral health care into nonpsychiatric settings. CoCM has been extensively studied in primary care clinics, but implementation in nonconventional clinics, such as those tailored to provide care for high-need, complex patients, has not been well described. Method: We adapted CoCM for a low-barrier HIV clinic that provides walk-in medical care for a patient population with high levels of mental illness, substance use, and housing instability. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model guided implementation activities and support through the phases of implementing CoCM. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Interventions guided our documentation of adaptations to process-of-care elements and structural elements of CoCM. We used a multicomponent strategy to implement the adapted CoCM model. In this article, we describe our experience through the first 6 months of implementation. Results: The key contextual factors necessitating adaptation of the CoCM model were the clinic team structure, lack of scheduled appointments, high complexity of the patient population, and time constraints with competing priorities for patient care, all of which required substantial flexibility in the model. The process-of-care elements were adapted to improve the fit of the intervention with the context, but the core structural elements of CoCM were maintained. Conclusions: The CoCM model can be adapted for a setting that requires more flexibility than the usual primary care clinic while maintaining the core elements of the intervention.

Indexed as

adaptationbehavioral health treatmentcollaborative carecomorbidities/comorbid conditionscomplex careEPIS frameworkFRAMEHIV-AIDSimplementationmarginalized populations

Identifiers

PMID37790178
PMCPMC10123894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.