Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790170›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Adapting the stages of implementation completion to an evidence-based implementation strategy: The development of the NIATx stages of implementation completion.

James H Ford, Mark E Zehner, Holle Schaper, Lisa Saldana

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03007940 (Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03007940 nacompletednot on this map

Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2015 to 2021Enrolled49ConditionsAddiction, Mental Health DisorderArmsCoach Site Visit, Walk-through, Learning Sessions, Coaching, Business as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James H FordSchool of Pharmacy, Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-2414
Mark E ZehnerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-897X
Holle SchaperOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.
Lisa SaldanaOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.

Funding

Facilitating Sustainment Through Implementation Feedback: The SIC Coaching ModelR01DA044745 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI SALDANA, LISA · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)R01DA052975 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine CareR01DA037222 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037222NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044745NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dissemination and implementation frameworks provide the scaffolding to explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practices (EBPs) targeting process of care and organizational outcomes. Few instruments, like the stages of implementation completion (SIC) examine implementation fidelity to EBP adoption and how organizations differ in their approach to implementation. Instruments to measure organizational competency in the utilization of implementation strategies are lacking. Method: An iterative process was utilized to adapt the SIC to the NIATx implementation strategies. The new instrument, NIATx-SIC, was applied in a randomized controlled trial involving 53 addiction treatment agencies in Washington state to improve agency co-occurring capacity. NIATx-SIC data were reported by state staff and external facilitators and through participating agency documentation. Proportion and duration scores for each stage and phase of the NIATx-SIC were calculated for each agency. Competency was assessed using the NIATx fidelity tool. Comparisons of proportion, duration, and NIATx activities completed were determined using independent sample Results: The NIATx-SIC distinguished between agencies achieving competency ( Conclusions: Organizational participation in dissemination and implementation research requires a significant investment of staff resources. The inability of an organization to achieve competency when utilizing a set of implementation strategies waste an opportunity to institutionalize knowledge of how to apply implementation strategies to future change efforts. The NIATx-SIC provides evidence that competency is not an attribute of the organization but rather a result of the application of the NIATx implementation strategies to improve agency co-occurring capacity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Registered January 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007940.

Indexed as

implementation strategiesNIATxstages of implementation completion

Identifiers

PMID37790170
PMCPMC10510360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.