Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790167›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Using information technology to integrate tobacco use treatment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Cancer Centers.

Jennifer E Bird, Claire Vt Nguyen, Sarah D Hohl, Heather D'Angelo, Danielle Pauk, Robert T Adsit, Michael Fiore, Mara Minion, Danielle McCarthy, Betsy Rolland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Smoking in Patients With Cancer: Guidance for Delivering Effective Tobacco Treatment in Cancer Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer E BirdCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-0348
Claire Vt NguyenCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarah D HohlCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-1868
Heather D'AngeloCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Danielle PaukCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Robert T AdsitCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael FioreCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mara MinionCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Danielle McCarthyCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Betsy RollandCarbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Transforming The Treatment of Tobacco Use in Health Care: Seizing The Potential of the Electronic Health Record to Deliver Comprehensive Chronic Care Treatment for SmokingR35CA197573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MICHAEL C FIORE · 2015 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients who receive evidence-based tobacco-dependence treatment are more likely to quit and remain abstinent, but tobacco treatment programs (TTPs) are not consistently offered. In 2017, the U.S. National Cancer Institute, through the Cancer Moonshot, funded the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I). C3I supports 52 cancer centers to implement and expand evidence-based tobacco treatment in routine oncology care. Integration into routine care involves the use of health information technology (IT), including modifying electronic health records and clinical workflows. Here, we examine C3I cancer centers' IT leadership involvement and experiences in tobacco-dependence treatment implementation. Method: This qualitative study of C3I-funded cancer centers integrated data from online surveys and in-person, semistructured interviews with IT leaders. We calculated descriptive statistics of survey data and applied content analysis to interview transcripts. Results: Themes regarding IT personnel included suggestions to involve IT early, communicate regularly, understand the roles and influence of the IT team, and match program design with IT funding and resources. Themes regarding electronic health record (EHR) modifications included beginning modifications early to account for long lead time to make changes, working with IT to identify and adapt existing EHR tools for TTP or designing tools that will support a desired workflow developed with end-users, and working with IT personnel to make sure TTPs comply with system and state policies (e.g., privacy laws). Conclusions: The experiences of C3I cancer centers regarding the use of health IT to enhance tobacco-dependence treatment program implementation can guide cancer centers and community oncology practices to potentially enhance TTP implementation and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cancerelectronic health recordinformation technologyqualitativetobacco

Identifiers

PMID37790167
PMCPMC10331328
OpenAlexW4383562621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.