ArticleCureus2023
Perceptions of Obstetrics/Gynecology Surgeons on Non-medically Indicated Cesarean Sections: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of prevalence, perceptions, and factors associated with reported history of caesarean section among women in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Design, development, and evaluation of a web-based consultation system for birth after cesarean: a mixed-method study protocol.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous factors can influence decisions regarding the type of delivery of human babies. There is an increasing demand for non-medically indicated cesarean sections (CS) (non-miCS) or CS on request (CSor). Therefore, this survey study aimed to identify the factors that may foster the decision of CS among obstetricians.
methodsAfter the sample size calculation returned with 132 needed participants, confidence surveys were sent electronically or disseminated in paper form to nearly all obstetricians (around 200) in the province between mid-August 2021 and mid-February 2022. After signing the consent form, obstetricians were able to provide responses to the four sections of the questionnaire. Data from the copies of the paper were entered into Excel by a local data collector. The data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) and followed the following sequence: summary statistics were done first; then the groups (for and against non-miCS) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA); and, finally, regression models were conducted to determine the factors that may affect the favorability of doing non-miCS.
resultsA total of 104 obstetricians responded to the survey. Approximately 62.5% of them performed CSor for women who requested it. In addition, more than half (57.7%) agreed that all women had the right and autonomy to choose their mode of delivery. Most providers (65.4) agreed that fear of vaginal delivery (VD) and a bad experience with it are rational reasons for performing a CSor. Unfortunately, some obstetricians (18.3%) faced lawsuits when they refused to perform CSor. As for the factors that may influence the acceptance of obstetricians to non-miCS, it was found that obstetricians who are unsure or refuse to answer (OR=4.30, 95%-CI 1.25-16.29, p=0.025), along with people who do not always perform CSor (OR=4.33, 95%-CI 1.59-12.50, p=0.005) or even refuse it (3.54, 95%-CI 1.05-12.96, p=0.046), are more likely to agree that women have the right to request CSor.
conclusionThe surge in CSor rates was mostly correlated with an attempt to escape the fear of VD. However, given the wide discrepancies in obstetricians' opinions in this survey, we cannot draw firm conclusions about the reasons behind this phenomenon. It is also important to explore possible ways to address the problem, such as through litigation with providers who refuse to perform a CSor and through economic reform to protect women from money-grubbing obstetricians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.