ArticleCureus2023
The Correlation of a Novel Photographic Parameter for Facial Profile Assessment in Subjects With Different Sagittal Malocclusions: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim The soft tissue paradigm shift is the current trend in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study's aim was to assess the correlation of newly derived photographic Frankfort horizontal plane-subnasale to soft tissue pogonion (FSA) angle with other established soft tissue cephalometric angles, such as the Z angle and the Holdaway (H) angle, for estimating facial profile convexity in subjects with all classes of sagittal malocclusions. Materials and methods This prospective study included a sample of 60 Dravidian population subjects consisting of 30 males and 30 females with different skeletal sagittal malocclusions (Class I, Class II, and Class III) based on the radiographic criteria (ANB angle). The Z and Holdaway angles on lateral cephalograms were compared with the FSA angles in cephalograms and digital profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Pearson's correlation was done to assess the correlation between soft tissue FSA angle on digital photographs and cephalometric angle (Z angle and Holdaway angle). Results The overall Pearson's correlation was significant (p < 0.05) between the Z and FSA angles in Class I, II, and III malocclusions, which had a high positive correlation. There was a significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) between the Holdaway and FSA angles in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions. A moderate positive correlation was noted between the Holdaway and FSA angles in Class III. Conclusion Photographic FSA angle can be used to evaluate the facial profile of subjects with different sagittal malocclusions. This angle has a good correlation with other cephalometric profile measures, such as the Z and Holdaway angles used to assess facial profile convexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.