Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789944›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2023

Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey.

Julien O Teitler, Valentina Chegwin, Linda Li, Kayuet Liu, Peter S Bearman, Marilyn A Gorney-Daley, Nancy E Reichman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julien O TeitlerSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Valentina ChegwinSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Linda LiSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Kayuet LiuDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Peter S BearmanDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Marilyn A Gorney-DaleyNew Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey.
Nancy E ReichmanRutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Columbia University · USNew Jersey Department of Health · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jennifer S Hirsch, Julien O Teitler · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
Obstetric Interventions, Neonatal Health, and Child DevelopmentR01HD090119 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI REICHMAN, NANCY E, TEITLER, JULIEN O · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the following questions: (1) what is the prevalence of elective deliveries at the population level?, (2) how has that changed over time?, and (3) to what extent do the rates of elective deliveries vary across the population? Methods: We first documented long-term trends in cesarean sections in the U.S., California, and New Jersey. We then used linked birth and hospital discharge records and an algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines to identify low-risk pregnancies and document trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey over a recent 2-decade period, overall and by maternal characteristics and gestational age. Results: In low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey, rates of cesarean sections and inductions increased sharply from the early 1990s through the mid-2000s, peaked at 33% in California and 41% in New Jersey in 2007, and then declined somewhat, and the proportions of inductions that were followed by cesarean sections increased from fewer than 1 in 5 to about 1 in 4. More education, non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, U.S.-born status, and non-Medicaid were associated with higher rates of interventions. Trends were similar across all socioeconomic groups, but differences have been narrowing in California. Among early-term (gestational age of 37-38 weeks) births in low-risk pregnancies, the rates of elective deliveries increased substantially in both states until the mid/late-2000s, peaked at about 35% in California and over 40% in New Jersey, and then decreased in both states to about 20%. Conclusions: Given established health risks of nonmedically necessary cesarean sections, that a nontrivial share of induced deliveries in low-risk pregnancies result in cesarean sections, and that interventions in low-risk pregnancies have not substantially declined since their peak in the mid-2000s, the trends documented in this paper suggest that sustained, even increased, public health attention is needed to address the still-too-high rates of cesarean sections and inductions in the U.S.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionsElective deliveriesinduced deliveriesJoint Commissionlow-risk pregnanciestrends

Identifiers

PMID37789944
PMCPMC10546565
OpenAlexW4309892441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.