ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Novel variants in the
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and modifier gene profiles in reversible infantile respiratory chain deficiency: three Chinese cases report and literature review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum of Raynaud-Claes Syndrome: A Rett-like Presentation with Two New Cases.Genes · 2026Review
- Dominant Action ofCells · 2025Article
- Endosomal 2Cl-/H+ exchangers regulate neuronal excitability by tuning Kv7/KCNQ channel density.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Comorbidity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Chung-Jansen Syndrome: Case Report and Review of Literature.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical features and genetic analysis of epilepsy caused byTranslational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Genotype-phenotype correlation in CLCN4-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.Human genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The dysfunction of the Methods: A total of 401 children with intellectual disabilities were screened for genetic variability using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Clinical data, including age, sex, perinatal conditions, and environmental exposure, were collected. Cognitive, verbal, motor, and social behavioral abilities were evaluated. Candidate variants were verified using Sanger sequencing, and their pathogenicity and conservation were analyzed using Results: Exome analysis identified five rare Conclusion: The study identified six probands with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.