Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

A rehabilitative approach beyond the acute stroke event: a scoping review about functional recovery perspectives in the chronic hemiplegic patient.

Teresa Paolucci, Francesco Agostini, Elena Mussomeli, Sara Cazzolla, Marco Conti, Francescapia Sarno, Andrea Bernetti, Marco Paoloni, Massimiliano Mangone

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06407830 (Effects of Motor Relearning Program With and Without Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Gait, Functional Independence and Quality of Life in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06407830 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Motor Relearning Program With and Without Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Gait, Functional Independence and Quality of Life in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsStrokeArmsmotor relearning programme, electrical muscle stimulations with motor relearning programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Teresa PaolucciDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Science (DSMOB), University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Francesco AgostiniDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Elena MussomeliDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Sara CazzollaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Marco ContiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Francescapia SarnoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Science (DSMOB), University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Andrea BernettiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Marco PaoloniDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano MangoneDepartment of Anatomy, Histology Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a main cause of disability worldwide and its neuro-rehabilitative management is not limited to the acute phase but requires continuity in the rehabilitation approach especially in the chronic phase. The aim of this scoping review was to highlight the different treatment opportunities available in neurorehabilitation, effective for patients with chronic stroke sequelae, not only in terms of maintaining motor function but also improving it. Methods: The literature search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane from 2012 to February 2023. We selected Randomized Clinical Trials in English dealing with neurorehabilitation strategies in chronic hemiplegic patients after stroke focusing on motor function, muscular strength, gait, postural balance, spasticity, and quality of life. Results: According to the inclusion criteria, 47 articles were selected for our review. All of them were analyzed following the primary outcome and the rehabilitation technique used. Despite the different protocols used within the same technique and despite the chronicity of the disease, all studies report an improvement after the rehabilitation treatment of motor function and quality of life. Conclusion: The literature analyzed invites us to reflect respect to neurorehabilitation approach to the patient with chronic stroke sequelae often considered to have as its objective the maintenance of the present motor function and contain disability: instead, the review reports how, even in chronicity, the patient always reports margins of statistically and clinically significant improvement. The chronic stroke rehabilitation over 6 months has been proved effective in obtaining recovery in different settings.

Indexed as

chronic strokehemiplegic patientmotor impairmentrecoveryrehabilitationstroke sequelae

Identifiers

PMID37789885
PMCPMC10542412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.