Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789825›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2024

The safety of at home powdered infant formula preparation: A community science project.

Aimee Grant, Sara Jones, Vicky Sibson, Rebecca Ellis, Abbie Dolling, Tara McNamara, Jonie Cooper, Susan Dvorak, Sharon Breward, Phyll Buchanan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Probiotics as a Barrier AgainstFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inactivation kinetics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aimee GrantCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Sara JonesCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Vicky SibsonFirst Steps Nutrition Trust, Studio 3.04, The Food Exchange New Covent Garden Market London, London, UK.
Rebecca EllisCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Abbie DollingCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Tara McNamaraCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jonie CooperCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Susan DvorakCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Sharon BrewardBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
Phyll BuchananThe Breastfeeding Network, Paisley, UK.
Emma YhnellSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff, UK.
Amy BrownCentre for Lactation, Infant Feeding and Translational Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-0157
Swansea University · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBCardiff University · GBScience Exchange (United States) · USUniversity of the West of Scotland · GB

Funding

HCRW_ HF-16-1152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formula fed infants experience gastrointestinal infections at higher rates than breastfed infants, due in part to bacteria in powdered infant formula (PIF) and bacterial contamination of infant feeding equipment. The United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) has adopted the World Health Organization recommendation that water used to reconstitute PIF is ≥70°C to eliminate bacteria. We used community science methods to co-design an at home experiment and online questionnaire ('research diary') to explore the safety of PIF preparation compared to UK NHS guidelines. 200 UK-based parents of infants aged ≤12 months were recruited; 151 provided data on PIF preparation, and 143 were included in the analysis of water temperatures used to reconstitute PIF. Only 14.9% (n = 11) of 74 PIF preparation machines produced a water temperature of ≥70°C compared with 78.3% (n = 54) of 69 kettle users (p < 0.001). The mean temperature of water dispensed by PIF preparation machines was 9°C lower than kettles (Machine M = 65.78°C, Kettle M = 75.29°C). Many parents did not always fully follow NHS safer PIF preparation guidance, and parents did not appear to understand the potential risks of PIF bacterial contamination. Parents should be advised that the water dispensed by PIF preparation machines may be below 70°C, and could result in bacteria remaining in infant formula, potentially leading to gastrointestinal infections. PIF labelling should advise that water used to prepare PIF should be ≥70°C and highight the risks of not using sufficiently hot water, per WHO Europe advice. There is an urgent need for stronger consumer protections regarding PIF preparation devices.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyInfant FormulaHumansInfantPowdersState MedicineWaterPowdersWaterbreast milk substituteschild healthfood safetyinfant feedinginfant formulaPIFpowdered infant formulapublic health

Identifiers

PMID37789825
PMCPMC10750023
OpenAlexW4387326979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.