Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789676›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2024

Large language models in radiology: fundamentals, applications, ethical considerations, risks, and future directions.

Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Arnaldo Stanzione, Christian Bluethgen, Federica Vernuccio, Lorenzo Ugga, Michail E Klontzas, Renato Cuocolo, Roberto Cannella, Burak Koçak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tugba Akinci D'AntonoliCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Liestal, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0002-7237-711X
Arnaldo StanzioneUniversity of Naples Federico II, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Naples, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-7905-5789
Christian BluethgenUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zurich, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0001-7321-5676
Federica VernuccioUniversity Hospital of Padova, Department of Radiology, Padova, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-0350-1794
Lorenzo UggaUniversity of Naples Federico II, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Naples, ItalyORCID 0000-0001-7811-4612
Michail E KlontzasDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece & Department of Radiology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece & Computational Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, Heraklion, Crete, GreeceORCID 0000-0003-2731-933X
Renato CuocoloUniversity of Salerno, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Baronissi, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-1452-1574
Roberto CannellaUniversity of Palermo, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Section of Radiology, Palermo, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-3808-0785
Burak KoçakUniversity of Health Sciences, Basakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-7307-396X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of large language models (LLMs), the artificial intelligence revolution in medicine and radiology is now more tangible than ever. Every day, an increasingly large number of articles are published that utilize LLMs in radiology. To adopt and safely implement this new technology in the field, radiologists should be familiar with its key concepts, understand at least the technical basics, and be aware of the potential risks and ethical considerations that come with it. In this review article, the authors provide an overview of the LLMs that might be relevant to the radiology community and include a brief discussion of their short history, technical basics, ChatGPT, prompt engineering, potential applications in medicine and radiology, advantages, disadvantages and risks, ethical and regulatory considerations, and future directions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyHumansLanguageRadiographyRadiologistsartificial intelligenceChatGPTdeep learningLarge language modelsnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37789676
PMCPMC10916534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.