Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789621›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2023

A Deep Learning Algorithm to Identify Anatomical Landmarks on Computed Tomography of the Temporal Bone.

Zubair Hasan, Seraphina Key, Michael Lee, Fiona Chen, Layal Aweidah, Aaron Esmaili, Raymond Sacks, Narinder Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence Assurance in Head and Neck Surgery: Now and Next.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · 2025
    Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in otorhinolaryngology: current trends and application areas.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zubair HasanUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Seraphina KeyMonash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Victoria, Australia.
Michael LeeUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Layal AweidahDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Aaron EsmailiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia.
Raymond SacksUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Concord Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Narinder SinghUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPetrous temporal bone cone-beam computed tomography scans help aid diagnosis and accurate identification of key operative landmarks in temporal bone and mastoid surgery. Our primary objective was to determine the accuracy of using a deep learning convolutional neural network algorithm to augment identification of structures on petrous temporal bone cone-beam computed tomography. Our secondary objective was to compare the accuracy of convolutional neural network structure identification when trained by a senior versus junior clinician.

methodsA total of 129 petrous temporal bone cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained from an Australian public tertiary hospital. Key intraoperative landmarks were labeled in 68 scans using bounding boxes on axial and coronal slices at the level of the malleoincudal joint by an otolaryngology registrar and board-certified otolaryngologist. Automated structure identification was performed on axial and coronal slices of the remaining 61 scans using a convolutional neural network (Microsoft Custom Vision) trained using the labeled dataset. Convolutional neural network structure identification accuracy was manually verified by an otolaryngologist, and accuracy when trained by the registrar and otolaryngologist labeled datasets respectively was compared.

resultsThe convolutional neural network was able to perform automated structure identification in petrous temporal bone cone-beam computed tomography scans with a high degree of accuracy in both axial (0.958) and coronal (0.924) slices (P < .001). Convolutional neural network accuracy was proportionate to the seniority of the training clinician in structures with features more difficult to distinguish on single slices such as the cochlea, vestibule, and carotid canal.

conclusionConvolutional neural networks can perform automated structure identification in petrous temporal bone cone-beam computed tomography scans with a high degree of accuracy, with the performance being proportionate to the seniority of the training clinician. Training of the convolutional neural network by the most senior clinician is desirable to maximize the accuracy of the results.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAustraliaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTemporal BoneTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37789621
PMCPMC10645193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.