Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789618›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

A calibration-free model of micropipette aspiration for measuring properties of protein condensates.

James V Roggeveen, Huan Wang, Zheng Shi, Howard A Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. RNA G-Quadruplexes Function as a Tunable Switch of FUS Phase Separation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Micropipette aspiration reveals differential RNA-dependent viscoelasticity of nucleolar subcompartments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James V RoggeveenDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Huan WangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Zheng ShiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey. Electronic address: zheng.shi@rutgers.edu.
Howard A StoneDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey. Electronic address: hastone@princeton.edu.

Funding

Understanding the viscoelasticity, surface tension, and membrane interactions of biomolecular condensates in live cellsR35GM147027 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Zheng Shi · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
Micropipette-based quantification of neuronal protein condensates in live cellsR21DA056322 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI SHI, ZHENG · 2022 to 2023
$392k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA056322NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that biological condensates, which are also referred to as membraneless organelles, and liquid-liquid phase separation play critical roles regulating many important cellular processes. Understanding the roles these condensates play in biology is predicated on understanding the material properties of these complex substances. Recently, micropipette aspiration (MPA) has been proposed as a tool to assay the viscosity and surface tension of condensates. This tool allows the measurement of both material properties in one relatively simple experiment, in contrast to many other techniques that only provide one or a ratio of parameters. While this technique has been commonly used in the literature to determine the material properties of membrane-bound objects dating back decades, the model describing the dynamics of MPA for objects with an external membrane does not correctly capture the hydrodynamics of unbounded fluids, leading to a calibration parameter several orders of magnitude larger than predicted. In this work we derive a new model for MPA of biological condensates that does not require any calibration and is consistent with the hydrodynamics of the MPA geometry. We validate the predictions of this model by conducting MPA experiments on a standard silicone oil of known material properties and are able to predict the viscosity and surface tension using MPA. Finally, we reanalyze with this new model the MPA data presented in previous works for condensates formed from LAF-1 RGG domains.

Indexed as

Surface TensionBiomolecular CondensatesCalibrationHydrodynamicsProteinsViscosityProteins

Identifiers

PMID37789618
PMCPMC11163300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.