Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789488›Full record

ArticleMolecular horticulture2022

The genome sequencing and comparative analysis of a wild kiwifruit Actinidia eriantha.

Xiaohong Yao, Shuaibin Wang, Zupeng Wang, Dawei Li, Quan Jiang, Qiong Zhang, Lei Gao, Caihong Zhong, Hongwen Huang, Yifei Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular horticulture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Repeated genetic adaptation under demographic limits in kiwifruit.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparative Chloroplast Genomics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohong Yao *Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Shuaibin Wang *Department of Bioinformatics, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Zupeng Wang *Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Dawei LiKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Quan JiangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Qiong ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Lei GaoKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Caihong ZhongKey Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specially Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Hongwen HuangLushan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, 332900, China.
Yifei LiuCollege of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China. liuyifei@hbtcm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4234-3365
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNHubei University of Chinese Medicine · CNLushan Botanical Garden · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China 2018YFD1000105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current kiwifruit industry is mainly based on the cultivars derived from the species Actinidia chinensis (Ac) which may bring risks such as canker disease. Introgression of desired traits from wild relatives is an important method for improving kiwifruit cultivars. Actinidia eriantha (Ae) is a particularly important taxon used for hybridization or introgressive breeding of new kiwifruit cultivars because of its valued species-specific traits. Here, we assembled a chromosome-scale high-quality genome of a Ae sample which was directly collected from its wild populations. Our analysis revealed that 41.3% of the genome consists of repetitive elements, comparable to the percentage in Ac and Ae cultivar "White" genomes. The genomic structural variation, including the presence/absence-variation (PAV) of genes, is distinct between Ae and Ac, despite both sharing the same two kiwifruit-specific whole genome duplication (WGD) events. This suggests that a post-WGD divergence mechanism occurred during their evolution. We further investigated genes involved in ascorbic acid biosynthesis and disease-resistance of Ae, and we found introgressive genome could contribute to the complex relationship between Ae and other representative kiwifruit taxa. Collectively, the Ae genome offers valuable genetic resource to accelerate kiwifruit breeding applications.

Indexed as

Disease resistanceEvolutionGenomeIntrogression breedingKiwifruitVitamin C

Identifiers

PMID37789488
PMCPMC10515239
OpenAlexW4229331978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.