ArticleBMC women's health2023
Association between grip strength and stress urinary incontinence of NHANES 2011-2014.
Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Handgrip Strength With Urinary Incontinence in Postmenopausal Korean Women: A Machine Learning Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between lipid accumulation products and relative handgrip strength: a large population-based study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Associations between metabolic score for visceral fat and urinary incontinence among US adult women: a population-based cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of conservative therapies for female stress urinary incontinence: Advancements, efficacy, and future directions.Current urology · 2025Review
- Grip strength, a predictor of stress urinary incontinence after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association between grip strength (GS) and relative grip strength (rGS) with the prevalence and severity risk of SUI.
methodsFemale patients were retrieved from the NHANES 2011-2014. GS was measured using a digital hand dynamometer, rGS was defined as grip strength divided by BMI. Samples were classified into four groups based on quartiles of GS and rGS distribution (Q1-Q4)。Logistic regression models were established to detect the relationship between GS or rGS and SUI. The potential bias of baseline variables between SUI and non-SUI groups was controlled by performing the propensity score matching (PSM).
resultsA total of 4263 samples were included, with 3085 (85%) people in non-SUI group and 1178 (27.6%) people in SUI group. GS and rGS levels of people without SUI were higher than that of SUI patients. Monthly SUI patients' GS and rGS levels were higher than weekly SUI patients' level. Logistic regression analysis showed that risks of prevalence and severity of SUI decreased with increasing levels of GS and rGS. rGS was found to have a stronger association with SUI than GS [prevalence: GS: Q4 vs. Q1: aOR = 0.633, 95%CI = 0.508-0.789, p < 0.001; rGS: Q4 vs. Q1: aOR = 0.365, 95%CI = 0.290-0.459, p < 0.001; severity: GS: Q4 vs. Q1: aOR = 0.727, 95%CI = 0.600-0.881, p = 0.001; rGS: Q4 vs. Q1: aOR = 0.371, 95%CI = 0.282-0.488, p < 0.001]. The results of PSM confirmed that GS and rGS were correlated with SUI.
conclusionsLower levels of GS and rGS are associated with an increased prevalence and severity risk of SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.