Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789295›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Community-based organizations' perspectives on piloting health and social care integration in North Carolina.

Raman Nohria, Junette Yu, Karissa Tu, Grace Feng, Shemecka Mcneil, Fred Johnson, Michelle Lyn, Karen Scherr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raman NohriaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2100 Erwin Road, 27705, Durham, NC, USA. raman.nohria@duke.edu.
Junette YuDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2100 Erwin Road, 27705, Durham, NC, USA.
Karissa TuUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Grace FengUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, 92093, CA, San Diego, USA.
Shemecka McneilSlice 325, Durham, NC, USA.
Fred JohnsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2100 Erwin Road, 27705, Durham, NC, USA.
Michelle LynDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2100 Erwin Road, 27705, Durham, NC, USA.
Karen ScherrDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2100 Erwin Road, 27705, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based organizations (CBOs) are key players in health and social care integration initiatives, yet little is known about CBO perspectives and experiences in these pilot programs. Understanding CBO perspectives is vital to identifying best practices for successful medical and social care integration.

methodsFrom February 2021 to March 2021, we conducted surveys with 12 CBOs that participated in the North Carolina COVID-19 Social Support Program, a pre-pilot for North Carolina's Medicaid Sect. 1115 demonstration waiver program that addresses social drivers of health.

resultsCBO participants preferred communication strategies that involved direct communication and felt clear communication was vital to the program's success. Participants expressed varied experiences regarding their ability to handle a changing volume of referrals. Participants identified their organizations' strengths as: strong organizational operations, past experiences with and understanding of the community, and coordination across organizations. Participants identified challenges as: difficulty communicating with clients, coping with capacity demands for scaling services, and lack of clear processes from external organizations. Almost all CBO participants expressed enthusiasm for participating in similar social care transformation programs in the future.

conclusionsCBO participants in our study had broadly positive experiences in the pilot program and almost all would participate in a similar program in the future. Participants provided perspectives that can inform health and social care integration initiatives, including strengths and challenges in such programs. To build and sustain health and social care integration programs, it is important to: (1) support CBOs through regular, direct communication that builds trust and power-sharing between CBO and health care entities; (2) leverage CBO community expertise; and (3) pursue an individualized assessment of CBO capacity and identify CBO capacity-building strategies that ensure program success and sustainability.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health ServicesHumansNorth CarolinaOrganizationsSocial SupportHealth and social care integrationHealth-related social needsMedicaid populationSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37789295
PMCPMC10548645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.