Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789273›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Interpreting single-step genomic evaluation as a neural network of three layers: pedigree, genotypes, and phenotypes.

Tianjing Zhao, Hao Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianjing ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1239-5957
Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. qtlcheng@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-7231

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67015-33412National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-67015-39564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single-step approach has become the most widely-used methodology for genomic evaluations when only a subset of phenotyped individuals in the pedigree are genotyped, where the genotypes for non-genotyped individuals are imputed based on gene contents (i.e., genotypes) of genotyped individuals through their pedigree relationships. We proposed a new method named single-step neural network with mixed models (NNMM) to represent single-step genomic evaluations as a neural network of three sequential layers: pedigree, genotypes, and phenotypes. These three sequential layers of information create a unified network instead of two separate steps, allowing the unobserved gene contents of non-genotyped individuals to be sampled based on pedigree, observed genotypes of genotyped individuals, and phenotypes. In addition to imputation of genotypes using all three sources of information, including phenotypes, genotypes, and pedigree, single-step NNMM provides a more flexible framework to allow nonlinear relationships between genotypes and phenotypes, and for individuals to be genotyped with different single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels. The single-step NNMM has been implemented in the software package "JWAS'.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticGenomicsGenotypeHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID37789273
PMCPMC10546757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.