ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: an analysis of medical devices and software.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory Approaches to Cybersecurity Risk Management for AI-Enabled Medical Device Software in Korea, the United States, and the European Union: Comparative Document Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Use and characteristics of free/libre and open source electronic health records: an overview of reviews.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- From 5G smart hospitals to 6G-enabled learning hospitals: a governance-oriented framework for healthcare technology, policy, and responsible deployment.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Data-driven FMEA approach for hazard identification and risk evaluation in digital health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Cybersecurity threats and preparedness: Implications for dental schools.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Cybersecurity requirements for medical devices in the EU and US - A comparison and gap analysis of the MDCG 2019-16 and FDA premarket cybersecurity guidance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Integrating 6G technology in smart hospitals: challenges and opportunities for enhanced healthcare services.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging MDS2 and SBOM data for LLM-assisted vulnerability analysis of medical devices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Cybersecurity governance in the healthcare sector during digital transformation: an integrated model and hybrid analytical approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Software evaluation on infant development to support teaching and professional training.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Digital approaches in post-COVID healthcare: a systematic review of technological innovations in disease management.Biology methods & protocols · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of IoT in healthcare has introduced vulnerabilities in medical devices and software, posing risks to patient safety and system integrity. This study aims to bridge the research gap and provide valuable insights for addressing healthcare vulnerabilities and their mitigation mechanisms. Software vulnerabilities related to health systems from 2001 to 2022 were collected from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) systematized by software developed by the researchers and assessed by a medical specialist for their impact on patient well-being. The analysis revealed electronic health records, wireless infusion pumps, endoscope cameras, and radiology information systems as the most vulnerable. In addition, critical vulnerabilities were identified, including poor credential management and hard-coded credentials. The investigation provides some insights into the consequences of vulnerabilities in health software products, projecting future security issues by 2025, offers mitigation suggestions, and highlights trends in attacks on life support and health systems are also provided. The healthcare industry needs significant improvements in protecting medical devices from cyberattacks. Securing communication channels and network schema and adopting secure software practices is necessary. In addition, collaboration, regulatory adherence, and continuous security monitoring are crucial. Industries, researchers, and stakeholders can utilize these findings to enhance security and safeguard patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.