Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789249›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: an analysis of medical devices and software.

Carlos M Mejía-Granda, José L Fernández-Alemán, Juan M Carrillo-de-Gea, José A García-Berná

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos M Mejía-GrandaDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain. carlosmichael.mejiag@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-6175
José L Fernández-AlemánDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-450X
Juan M Carrillo-de-GeaDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-622X
José A García-BernáDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-8565
Universidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-122554OB-C32Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RTI2018-098309-BC33Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TIN2017-90689-REDT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of IoT in healthcare has introduced vulnerabilities in medical devices and software, posing risks to patient safety and system integrity. This study aims to bridge the research gap and provide valuable insights for addressing healthcare vulnerabilities and their mitigation mechanisms. Software vulnerabilities related to health systems from 2001 to 2022 were collected from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) systematized by software developed by the researchers and assessed by a medical specialist for their impact on patient well-being. The analysis revealed electronic health records, wireless infusion pumps, endoscope cameras, and radiology information systems as the most vulnerable. In addition, critical vulnerabilities were identified, including poor credential management and hard-coded credentials. The investigation provides some insights into the consequences of vulnerabilities in health software products, projecting future security issues by 2025, offers mitigation suggestions, and highlights trends in attacks on life support and health systems are also provided. The healthcare industry needs significant improvements in protecting medical devices from cyberattacks. Securing communication channels and network schema and adopting secure software practices is necessary. In addition, collaboration, regulatory adherence, and continuous security monitoring are crucial. Industries, researchers, and stakeholders can utilize these findings to enhance security and safeguard patient safety.

Indexed as

Computer SecuritySoftwareDelivery of Health CareHumansDescriptive studySoftware securitySoftware vulnerabilities in healthVulnerability databases

Identifiers

PMID37789249
PMCPMC10758361
OpenAlexW4387312999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.