Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789241›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2023

Complexities of deep learning-based undersampled MR image reconstruction.

Constant Richard Noordman, Derya Yakar, Joeran Bosma, Frank Frederikus Jacobus Simonis, Henkjan Huisman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Constant Richard NoordmanDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands. stan.noordman@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4358-0087
Derya YakarMedical Imaging Center, Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.
Joeran BosmaDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Frank Frederikus Jacobus SimonisMagnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands.
Henkjan HuismanDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has opened a new path of innovation in magnetic resonance (MR) image reconstruction of undersampled k-space acquisitions. This review offers readers an analysis of the current deep learning-based MR image reconstruction methods. The literature in this field shows exponential growth, both in volume and complexity, as the capabilities of machine learning in solving inverse problems such as image reconstruction are explored. We review the latest developments, aiming to assist researchers and radiologists who are developing new methods or seeking to provide valuable feedback. We shed light on key concepts by exploring the technical intricacies of MR image reconstruction, highlighting the importance of raw datasets and the difficulty of evaluating diagnostic value using standard metrics.Relevance statement Increasingly complex algorithms output reconstructed images that are difficult to assess for robustness and diagnostic quality, necessitating high-quality datasets and collaboration with radiologists.Key points• Deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms are increasing both in complexity and performance.• The evaluation of reconstructed images may mistake perceived image quality for diagnostic value.• Collaboration with radiologists is crucial for advancing deep learning technology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceDeep learningImage processing (computer-assisted)Magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37789241
PMCPMC10547669
OpenAlexW4387298277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.