ArticleCancer treatment and research2023
Making Decisions When no Further Diagnostic Testing is Available (Expected Regret Theory Threshold Model).
Article in Cancer treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- How to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE: an evidence-based decision-analytical approach.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Improving Guideline Development Processes: Integrating Evidence Estimation and Decision-Analytical Frameworks.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Thrombophilia management calculator.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Decision theoretical foundations of clinical practice guidelines: an extension of the ASH thrombophilia guidelines.Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Chap. 2 , we illustrated the application of the expected utility theory (EUT) to rational decision-making when no further diagnostic testing is available. In this chapter, we apply regret theory to the decision problems discussed in Chap. 2 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
37789159What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.