Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789125›Full record

Trial reportReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

CHronic hypERtension and L-citRulline studY (CHERRY): an Early-Phase Randomised Controlled Trial in Pregnancy.

Laura Ormesher, Stephanie A Worton, Ashley Best, Susanna R Dodd, Alice Dempsey, Elizabeth C Cottrell, Heather Glossop, Catherine Chmiel, Hoi Yee Wu, Ben Hardwick and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Ormesher *Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Stephanie A Worton *Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ashley BestLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Susanna R DoddLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alice DempseyManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Elizabeth C CottrellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Heather GlossopManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Catherine ChmielMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hoi Yee WuManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ben HardwickLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sophie HennessyLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Edward D JohnstoneManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jenny E MyersManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. jenny.myers@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research CS-2011-020Tommy's Fetal Health Research Centre GrantTommy's Maternal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral supplementation with L-citrulline, which is sequentially converted to L-arginine then nitric oxide, improves vascular biomarkers and reduces blood pressure in non-pregnant, hypertensive human cohorts and pregnant mice with a pre-eclampsia-like syndrome. This early-phase randomised feasibility trial assessed the acceptability of L-citrulline supplementation to pregnant women with chronic hypertension and its effects on maternal BP and other vascular outcomes. Pregnant women with chronic hypertension were randomised at 12-16 weeks to receive 3-g L-citrulline twice daily (n = 24) or placebo (n = 12) for 8 weeks. Pregnant women reported high acceptability of oral L-citrulline. Treatment increased maternal plasma levels of citrulline, arginine and the arginine:asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio, particularly in women reporting good compliance. L-citrulline had no effect on diastolic BP (L-citrulline: - 1.82 95% CI (- 5.86, 2.22) vs placebo: - 5.00 95% CI (- 12.76, 2.76)), uterine artery Doppler or angiogenic biomarkers. Although there was no effect on BP, retrospectively, this study was underpowered to detect BP changes < 9 mmHg, limiting the conclusions about biological effects. The increase in arginine:asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio was less than in non-pregnant populations, which likely reflects altered pharmacokinetics of pregnancy, and further pharmacokinetic assessment of L-citrulline in pregnancy is advised.Trial Registration EudraCT 2015-005792-25 (2017-12-22) and ISRCTN12695929 (2018-09-20).

Indexed as

CitrullineHypertensionArginineBiomarkersDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansNitric OxidePregnancyRetrospective StudiesArginineBiomarkersCitrullineNitric OxideAsymmetric dimethylarginineCitrullineHypertensionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37789125
PMCPMC10827856
OpenAlexW4387305037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.