ArticleScientific reports2023
Risk of data leakage in estimating the diagnostic performance of a deep-learning-based computer-aided system for psychiatric disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Validation Strategies in Motor Imagery EEG: A Full-Cohort GAF-PLV Analysis and Matched Sensitivity Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Digital Gait Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease: Subject-Wise Validated Explainable AI Framework Using Vertical Ground Reaction Force Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Approaches to Detect Papilloma-Associated Hyperostosis Using a Few-Shot Transfer Learning Framework in Extremely Scarce Radiological Datasets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DDGWizard: Integration of feature calculation resources for analysis and prediction of changes in protein thermostability upon point mutations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in Human Participants Using EEGConformer and Attention-Based LSTM During the Short Question Task.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in Electroencephalography for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Identification: A Scoping Review.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Ensemble machine learning for predicting renal function decline in chronic kidney disease: development and external validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict time to renal replacement therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Exploring the Possibility of Photoplethysmography-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep-learning approaches with data augmentation have been widely used when developing neuroimaging-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems. To prevent the inflated diagnostic performance caused by data leakage, a correct cross-validation (CV) method should be employed, but this has been still overlooked in recent deep-learning-based CAD studies. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of correct and incorrect CV methods on the diagnostic performance of deep-learning-based CAD systems after data augmentation. To this end, resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) data recorded from post-traumatic stress disorder patients and healthy controls were augmented using a cropping method with different window sizes, respectively. Four different CV approaches were used to estimate the diagnostic performance of the CAD system, i.e., subject-wise CV (sCV), overlapped sCV (oSCV), trial-wise CV (tCV), and overlapped tCV (otCV). Diagnostic performances were evaluated using two deep-learning models based on convolutional neural network. Data augmentation can increase the performance with all CVs, but inflated diagnostic performances were observed when using incorrect CVs (tCV and otCV) due to data leakage. Therefore, the correct CV (sCV and osCV) should be used to develop a deep-learning-based CAD system. We expect that our investigation can provide deep-insight for researchers who plan to develop neuroimaging-based CAD systems for psychiatric disorders using deep-learning algorithms with data augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.