Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789036›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Human papillomavirus and prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Irina A Tsydenova, Marina K Ibragimova, Matvey M Tsyganov, Nikolai V Litviakov

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role and mechanism of human papillomavirus in urinary system tumors.The Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina A TsydenovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028. tsydenova422@gmail.com.
Marina K IbragimovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028.
Matvey M TsyganovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028.
Nikolai V LitviakovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028.
Tomsk National Research Medical Center · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The involvement of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the prostate carcinogenesis is a controversial issue. The presented meta-analysis was carried out to systematize the currently available research results regarding this question. The meta-analysis includes case-control studies from 1991 to 2022, which were collected from publicly available bibliometric databases. The meta-analysis was performed using Meta-Essentials_1.5 software. We used Begg's and Egger's methods to assess publication bias. Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity and the I

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMalePapillomaviridae

Identifiers

PMID37789036
PMCPMC10547781
OpenAlexW4387312643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.