Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37789022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Flower electrodes for comfortable dry electroencephalography.

Indhika Fauzhan Warsito, Milana Komosar, Maria Anne Bernhard, Patrique Fiedler, Jens Haueisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Indhika Fauzhan Warsito *Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics at the Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-9867
Milana Komosar *Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics at the Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-0224
Maria Anne BernhardInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics at the Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6959-319X
Patrique FiedlerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics at the Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-0717
Jens HaueisenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics at the Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany. jens.haueisen@tu-ilmenau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-2890

Funding

Marie Curie 813483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes provide rapid, gel-free, and easy EEG preparation, but with limited wearing comfort. We propose a novel dry electrode comprising multiple tilted pins in a flower-like arrangement. The novel Flower electrode increases wearing comfort and contact area while maintaining ease of use. In a study with 20 volunteers, we compare the performance of a novel 64-channel dry Flower electrode cap to a commercial dry Multipin electrode cap in sitting and supine positions. The wearing comfort of the Flower cap was rated as significantly improved both in sitting and supine positions. The channel reliability and average impedances of both electrode systems were comparable. Averaged VEP components showed no considerable differences in global field power amplitude and latency, as well as in signal-to-noise ratio and topography. No considerable differences were found in the power spectral density of the resting state EEGs between 1 and 40 Hz. Overall, our findings provide evidence for equivalent channel reliability and signal characteristics of the compared cap systems in the sitting and supine positions. The reliability, signal quality, and significantly improved wearing comfort of the Flower electrode allow new fields of applications for dry EEG in long-term monitoring, sensitive populations, and recording in supine position.

Indexed as

Bone NailsElectroencephalographyElectric ImpedanceElectrodesHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37789022
PMCPMC10547758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.